
“Therefore, I tell you, her many sins have been forgiven — as her great love has shown. But whoever has been forgiven little loves little.” — Luke 7:47 NIV
She did not ask for permission. She walked into a Pharisee’s dinner party — a room she had no right to enter — knelt behind Jesus, and wept until her tears fell on His feet. Then she wiped them with her hair and poured expensive perfume over Him.
Every man in that room knew her reputation. And every man in that room watched Jesus do nothing to stop her.
That scene is the center of gravity in Luke 7. And the theology it contains is radical enough to still upset religious people two thousand years later.
The Setting: Simon’s Table
Simon the Pharisee had invited Jesus to dine with him. The invitation was likely motivated by curiosity — or perhaps suspicion. Pharisees monitored Jesus closely. They were not his friends.
The woman — unnamed in Luke’s account, and most likely not Mary Magdalene despite centuries of conflation — was described simply as ‘a woman in that city who was a sinner’ (Luke 7:37). In first-century Galilee, that phrase likely designated a prostitute. Her presence at a Pharisee’s dinner was itself an act of desperation.
She brought an alabaster flask of ointment. Alabaster was expensive. The perfume inside was more so. This was not a casual gesture. She spent something significant to get to Jesus.
Simon’s Silent Verdict
Luke 7:39 tells us what Simon thought but did not say aloud: ‘If this man were a prophet, he would have known who and what sort of woman this is who is touching him, for she is a sinner.’
Notice the logic. Simon’s assumption was that holiness requires distance from the defiled. A real prophet — a genuine man of God — would pull away. Would pronounce judgment. Would maintain ritual purity.
That is a theology of separation. And Jesus dismantled it completely.
The Two Debtors: A Precision Argument
Jesus did not respond with rebuke. He told Simon a parable.
Two men owed a moneylender — one five hundred denarii, one fifty. The lender cancelled both debts. Jesus asked: which one loved him more?
Simon answered correctly: the one forgiven more.
Then Jesus turned it on him. He compared Simon’s cold, minimal hospitality — no foot-washing, no greeting kiss, no oil for the head — with the woman’s lavish, tearful outpouring. The contrast was intentional and devastating. Simon had treated Jesus as a curiosity. She had treated Him as a Savior.
The theological point: the depth of gratitude reveals the depth of felt forgiveness. Simon felt forgiven little because he believed he owed little. The woman knew her debt. And she poured her worship accordingly.
‘Your Sins Are Forgiven’: The Shock of the Declaration
Jesus looked at the woman and said: ‘Your sins are forgiven’ (Luke 7:48).
The room erupted — not in praise, but in argument. ‘Who is this who even forgives sins?’ (7:49). That question is the most important theological question in the New Testament. It is the same question embedded in John 1:1, Matthew 26:63–64, and Colossians 1:15–17.
Only God forgives sin. The Old Testament established that unambiguously (Isaiah 43:25, Psalm 103:12). When Jesus said those three words to that woman, He was not offering pastoral comfort. He was making a divine claim. And the Pharisees understood that perfectly — which is why they were outraged.
‘Your Faith Has Saved You’: What Did He Mean?
Jesus closed the scene with: ‘Your faith has saved you. Go in peace’ (7:50).
This phrase — sōzō, the Greek word for saved — carries enormous theological freight in Luke’s Gospel. It encompasses physical healing, spiritual deliverance, and eternal salvation depending on context. Here, the context is unmistakably spiritual.
She did not earn forgiveness through her tears or her perfume. Those were expressions of faith already at work in her. The saving act was God’s. Her response was her recognition of it.
That is the doctrine of grace in a single scene. The woman brought nothing God needed. She brought everything she had. And He gave her what she could never buy.
Why This Still Disrupts Religion
Simon had the theology. He had the training. He had the table. And he missed the moment entirely.
The woman had nothing — except a broken heart and a belief that Jesus was worth the embarrassment. And she walked out forgiven.
Luke 7 is a warning to every person who approaches God as a creditor rather than a debtor. You can know all the right doctrine and still love very little. You can sit at the right table and never really taste what is being offered.
The theology of forgiveness in Luke 7 is not complicated. It is just costly to the ego. You have to know your debt to feel the weight of its cancellation.
Reflection Questions
1. Where in your spiritual life do you resemble Simon — informed but unmoved?
2. Have you ever experienced a moment of forgiveness so deep it broke you open the way it broke this woman?
3. What does it mean that Jesus forgave her before she asked?
Paul R. Schmidt writes on faith, theology, and Christian survival fiction at myfaithtales.com.




